A Rambling E-mail

My brother, Ted, was responding to a someone in an e-mail regarding a person the recipient should know but seems confused.

This was Ted’s reply:
Gary, the guy in your room at work. Maybe you can’t see him, he’s right behind you! Boo! Sometimes he is invisible, for instance, I didn’t see him when I was there, but he left a message on my computer so I know he exists. Unless he is a computer, but then why would he give me a laptop computer to fix? Why would a computer need a laptop? It’s pretty puzzling.
Who’s Mike? Is that a code? I have several mikes, but most of them don’t work so well. The one on my MP3 player works good though. I could record an interrogation for instance if I was ever arrested. I am sure if it would be admissible evidence since Maine has a rule that if one party consents it is ok (well, unless I didn’t consent, then it wouldn’t). It would make the police mad though, especially if they were named Mike I bet. Then it would be Double Jeopardy. That would then involve Alex Trebek and you know how arrogant he can be (I still love his show though).
“I’ll take interrogation for $100 Alex”
But then I would provide a question for an answer? That’s like backwards. “What is Beagle Soup Alex”
That kind of answer makes no sense!! Who eats Beagle Soup? Not me!! Man, this is really confusing.

My response to all of this?  What in the world has he been smoking???

Still…love a good rambling e-mail that makes no sense.